There is a lot of information to absorb here. A good way to get started is to review this style guide in Wiki format here: Ezvid Wikimaker Style Guide Part One.
Click the title at the top of your Wiki to rename it.
A good way to jump-start your Wiki creation process is by cloning images from an existing Wiki. First, choose any Wiki from here, and get the URL into your clipboard. Then, make a new Wiki and use this link at the bottom of the edit page:
As you work, Chrome should identify spelling errors.
If you do not see spelling errors underlined in red, right click in the text box be sure spell checking is turned on.
Review a few published wikis to get a feel for our standards of quality.
Unlike many user-generated websites, Ezvid Wiki does not accept factually incorrect submissions. If our system identifies factual inaccuracies in your submission, it may not be published.
Copy/pasting from sources not in the creative commons is banned. If our system detects plagiarism, your Wiki may be automatically removed. Do note that facts can not be owned or copyrighted, so if your submission shares facts with existing content on the Internet, this is not necessarily a problem.
Your wiki should be well researched and typically between 750 to 900 words in length. If your subject matter really cannot support this many words, you may make a shorter Wiki, but never fewer than 500 words. Note that your word count will be displayed at the bottom of the screen while you work. You can go up to 1000 words, and typically Wikimaker should not allow you to exceed this by very much.
Our intended audience has a high-school education, and no previous technical knowledge. Our audience is not computer-savvy or internet-savvy. We need to communicate in short, clear sentences, and whenever we are discussing a technical issue, or something on the Internet, we need to move very slowly and provide step-by-step instructions and images.
The tone of your writing should be similar to an outlet for serious journalism, such as The Washington Post, or an encyclopedia, such as Encyclopedia Britannica or Wikipedia. Generally you should rarely, if ever, use exclamation points.
We are writing reference material, not journalism. These Wikis must still be relevant and useful 5 years from now. Never write about the current month, year, or season, or use any references that could easily go out of date. Similarly, never use vauge references to the current period, such as the word "nowadays" or "these days."
This is a nuanced rule, because there are many instances in which the passive voice might be appropriate. Read up on it here.
You may reference websites, but when you do so, shorten the URL to remove elements like
For example, if you are discussing Apple Computer's website, instead of
When discussing products or services, don't use exact prices like
$159. These are likely to go out-of-date quickly, and become inaccurate. Instead, use general
about $20 or
When possible, avoid the use of dashes like
--. Our voice synthesizer
often has trouble working out how they should be vocalized. Generally compound words like
might work out fine, but writing
5-10 people will not work well, because our voice synthesizer
can't figure out how to vocalize the dash. Instead, write
5 to 10.
Learn standard English's rules for capitalization.
For example, it is critical that you understand the difference betweeen
its . Please study this guide.
An example of unacceptable prose is:
The greatest advantage of using Facetime is that it is
absolutely free of charge. You heard right, there is no fee. Your tone must be neutral, balanced, and
Repetitive language is a hallmark of bad writing, and especially problematic when vocalized into speech. You need to use your judgement, becuase repeated words aren't always a problem.... but here is a particularly bad example:
The text of your wiki needs to be able to stand alone, without the accompanying video.
Therefore, never use vague or time-specific references to on-screen images, for example
next, you will see this screen. Instead, always be specific, for example
next, you will see a screen that confirms your purchase.
Our voice synthesizer is good, but not perfect. For example, with acronyms like
ASPCA, it can get confused. Sometimes it might try to pronounce these as words,
instead of one letter a time. Listen back to your Wiki, and if you notice this problem, try inserting
periods between each letter of an acronym, like
Images that you upload to Wikimaker must be directly relevant to your subject matter, add
value to your prose, and not contain English text. Don't upload obvious clip art, images with words in them, or anything low quality.
All the images circled in red here are low quality and not useful, except the one with the text
That is acceptable, because it really is showing a youtube user, and that's what this wiki is about:
There are some exceptions to the rule against text in images, including news clippings, website screenshots, and elsewhere where it can be useful to show evidence or prove a point. If an image you upload requires reading, for example, of a headline, assume that the viewer of your video is a slow reader and will require a few seconds to read and register text onscreen. Give them the time to read the text and don't rush to the next image.
This is a Wiki about a Facebook product. These usages of the Facebook logo and Facebook messenger logo are really boring and make for a very boring video. Instead, this writer should have performed some screen capture of the Facebook website, mobile app, or something else interesting like that.
Landscape images are defined as image that are significantly longer than they are high. And this is what
16:9 looks like.
Images uploaded to Wikimaker should ideally be:
1280x720(or better) Resolution
You may upload images of other aspect ratios, they will be rendered into video with "black borders" around them, like this:
This isn't ideal, however, for many historical photos and other types of media, where better images options might not be available, it will better to use the portrait-formatted image instead of not using it at all. Don't attempt to use external editing software to "squash" the images into landscape format.
We do recommend that you use Wikimaker Capture to gather the majority of your uploaded image sources, as then, as long as you frame the image correctly with the software, you won't ever have to worry about issues with aspect ratio.
To make how-to guides, sometimes you will need to be logged in to web services. In cases where there is any identifying information onscreen, in the case of screen recording, make sure the identifying details are out of the recorded video area, and in the case of screen capture, use the same strategy and additionally use the eraser tool, when necessary.
As you work with Wikimaker, our artificially intelligent system will automatically assign images to your text. You should remove those which might be confusing for the watcher of the video. This requires thinking and judgment. Here is a good example:
You can see here that an image of colored pencils has been assigned to the word "Color".
In this case, we are using the word "color" in reference to a specific feature of our main topic, which is
How To Do An
Advanced Image Search.
In this case, we should remove or replace the automatically matched image, and an excellent replacement might be to use Wikimaker Capture to make a screen recording showing the the actual color tool on the website. That would be very easy to understand, and useful.
This does require judgement, because for example, in the same above screenshot, we can see that the word "high quality" has been matched with a picture of high quality diamonds or gems. In my opinion, this is relevant enough, as the viewer will be able to make the connection in his/her mind between the concept of "high quality images" and "high quality gems".
Here the topic of our Wiki is
Google Images. Here you can see that our system has matched a
"Google" logo with the word "Google".
But our subject is "Google Images", not the company Google. This image should be removed and replaced with a screenshot of the Google Images homepage, or a screen recording thereof. Something that really shows the topic.
Here the writer is discussing an actual thing -- a website called RARBG. You can even see that he has included some screen capture of it, it's clip #2.
He left a bunch of automatic images in place -- "2008", "high quality", "active". Are these terrible? No. But I bet that this writer could have done a 30 second screen recording of his mouse roaming around on the RARBG website, and it would be a lot more interesting and informative than these automatic images.
A strict set of standards applies to any capture or upload that you make to Wikimaker. These must always be highly relevant to the subject matter. Here you can see that the user has uploaded a picture of a coffee filter to reference the words "filter your result."
This is not acceptable. The user should have uploaded a screenshot or screen recording, showing the actual Google Images interface where the filtering happens.
If your Wiki is about a concept or idea, and not a person, place or thing, the above rules about image relevancy are relaxed. For example, for this wiki, even very vague images, that successfully convey an emotion or idea, are acceptable.
Here is an example of a failure to be explicit enough:
These words I have underlined in red refer to specific things in an interface. There should be 3 to 4 separate screenshots here, clearly showing the "Size drop-drop", showing the user "selecting Large", showing the "Color tool" and showing the clicking of the "transparent" icon.
This is an example of a well-done, clear and explicit How-To Wiki. Please watch it.
This writer is teaching us about Twitter search, but hasn't zoomed or enlarged text in his browser, so it's really hard to see what he is doing:
This writer should have zoomed his browser (
Cntrl + or
or zoomed the text with these Ezvid Wikimaker For Chrome commands
Alt = and
pay here is assigned to a not-so-interesting image of a money and scissors.
That's not terrible, but notice that the next image that appears isn't until the word
This makes for a *boring* video… nobody wants to look at a still image for 5 seconds.
It is your responsibility to make the videos entertaining and useful: Take that seriously.
In this case, the writer should have added some interesting video, images,
or screen capture after the word
pay, to make this more interesting.
Niccolò here will get corrupted in our Voice Synthesis Engine.
Only use characters that commonly occur in English words.
In this case, you should use:
When you are adding images, you can drag and drop existing images to move them around.
When you are telling a story with screen recording, often you will want your actions in the recording to
tightly match the words that Wikimaker speaks. A great and very time-efficient strategy for this is to make just one screen recording
but add it to multiple words, each time choosing a different starting frame that corresponds to the word. In below screenshot, I have
made just one screen recording, and assigned it three times, once to
english, once to
susan, and once to
philadelphia, each time choosing a different start frame.
Watch how tightly synchronized the product is of this.. and the whole process took me just a couple minutes. There is an illusion that I timed my recording exactly to match the words, but actually my recording was much slower than the speech and I paused several times during it.... I made the screen recording match the words exactly by assigning the screen recording multiple times to multiple words.
When mentioning each item in a list, you will want to use a number. For example, you might have text like
Coming in at #6, the Schuler Twin Turbo mower is one of the more interesting entries on the marketplace.
You can make the animation for the number appear by using this exact format:
#6 .... that is, the
symbol immediately followed by the
number. When you use that exact format, you'll see our cool custom graphics for the number.
It needs to be exact. This is a bit like computer programming. If you use
# 1 (with an extra space) or
number 1, it won't work. Also note that these numbers will only appear once per Wiki.
So if you use
#1 twice in a Wiki, the image will only show up for the first one.
This might also be a hint to make your writing less repetitive, but use your judgement.
As you're working, you'll likely want to nudge the positioning of your images. To do this, get to the "choose starting word" screen by adding any image, either from the image search box or from your upload panel -- it doesn't matter which. From there you can drag and drop any existing image onto any existing word. You'll see the taret word highlight in yellow when you drag an image over it. Then click the "X" button to close the screen without adding a new image.